Introduction
Courses and degree programs related to sustainable
agriculture and food systems have been on the rise globally, with increasing
recognition of the complex socio-ecological problems associated with industrial
agrifood systems (David and Bell 2018; Horner et al. 2021). Within
sustainable agriculture and food systems education (SFSE), agroecology programs
have gained significant popularity (Kumar and Kumar 2014; David and Bell 2018).
Agroecology encompasses scientific inquiry, on-farm practices, and social
movements, with a growing emphasis on transformative approaches that address
power dynamics, equity, and ecological renewal (Wezel et al. 2009;
Anderson and Anderson 2020).
Transformative
agroecology – a transdisciplinary, participatory, action-oriented, and
political approach to building socially just and ecologically sound agrifood
systems, has gained attention among scholars, practitioners, and activists
(Horner et al. 2021). It draws from previous work on the systems and
structures that shape relationships, knowledge, and power within agricultural food
systems (Molina 2013; Kuri et al. 2023). Transformative agroecology
recognizes the need for critical reflection and reflexive practice to navigate the
complexities of this approach (Méndez et al. 2017).
In pursuing
transformative agroecology, it is essential to consider the pedagogical
approaches employed in agroecology education. Pedagogy is crucial in
determining which types of knowledge are valued and how learning experiences
can facilitate transformation and transition processes (Anderson et al.
2019). Initially, introduced by Mezirow (1991), transformative learning
involves a shift in a student's frame of reference through experience and
reflection, aligning with experiential approaches to education (Probst et
al. 2019). It provides a framework for developing critical thinking skills
and fostering a deep understanding of the complex social, economic, and
ecological dimensions of agrifood systems.
While
transformative learning has been acknowledged in agroecology and SFSE
education, explicit consideration of specific pedagogies for transformative
learning remains limited (Migliorini and Lieblein 2016). Questions persist
regarding the pedagogies that facilitate transformative learning and how
agroecology education can support broader agroecological transformations
(Anderson and Anderson 2020). There is a need for research to identify and
assess transformative learning within agroecology and SFSE education, exploring
the pedagogical approaches that enable students to reflect on their positionality
within food systems critically and engage with the local contexts (van Oers et
al. 2023).
This
manuscript aims to contribute to the understanding of pedagogy for
transformative learning in the context of sustainable agriculture and
environmental education (Fig. 1). Drawing on case studies and scholarly
insights, the key principles and approaches of transformative learning in
sustainable agriculture and environment have been explored. The way pedagogy can
support transformative learning experiences, foster critical thinking, and
empower individuals to address complex environmental challenges has been
discussed. The benefits, challenges, and potential outcomes of implementing
transformative pedagogy in these fields have also been elaborated. Through this
exploration, this manuscript is aimed to contribute to the ongoing efforts of
educators, scholars, practitioners to promote transformative learning in
sustainable agriculture and the environment, fostering a more sustainable and
equitable future for the global food systems.
Concept of transformative
learning
Transformative learning is a profound educational
process that fosters a fundamental shift in an individual's beliefs,
assumptions, and values, leading to a significant transformation in their
perspectives and actions (Fig. 1; Mezirow 1991; Cranton 1994). This concept,
first introduced by Jack Mezirow, has since become a central pillar in adult
and higher education, with broad applicability to diverse disciplines,
including sustainable agriculture and environmental studies. At the core of
transformative learning, theory recognizes that learners construct their
understanding of the world through experiences and reflection (Mezirow 1991;
Anand et al. 2020). It aligns with social constructivist perspectives
that emphasize the active role of learners in shaping their knowledge and
meaning-making processes (Probst et al. 2019). Transformative learning
goes beyond acquiring new information; it calls for a deep critical examination
of one's assumptions and the socio-cultural contexts that shape them.
The
transformative learning theory of Mezirow (1978) is grounded in the idea that
learning is not just about obtaining knowledge but also involves unlearning and
relearning. The theory highlights the importance of critical reflection, where
learners question their previously unquestioned beliefs and cultural norms and
engage in self-examination (Mezirow 1991). Critical reflection enables
individuals to confront and challenge their existing mental models,
facilitating the exploration of new perspectives and ideas and alternative ways
of thinking (Horner et al. 2021). Moreover, transformative learning is
not a solitary process; it thrives in dialogue and interaction with others
(Mezirow 1991). Engaging in meaningful conversations with peers, educators, and
community members can expose learners to diverse viewpoints and challenge their
pre-conceived notions (Cranton 1994). These dialogues foster a sense of empathy, understanding, and openness to alternative
perspectives, which are essential for transformative learning experiences.
Experiential
learning is also vital in transformative learning theory (Cranton 1994). It is
emphasized that transformative learning often emerges from real-life
experiences that disrupt one's existing worldview and prompt critical
reflection (Mezirow 1991; Fleming 2018). In sustainable agriculture and the
environment, experiential learning can involve engaging with environmental
challenges, participating in community-based initiatives, and observing the
consequences of unsustainable practices. Such experiences provide powerful
opportunities for learners to reassess their beliefs and develop a deeper
connection to the subject matter (Taylor and Cranton 2013).
The concept
of transformative learning, pioneered by Jack Mezirow, offers a valuable
framework for understanding how individuals can undergo profound intellectual
and emotional changes. In sustainable agriculture and environmental education,
transformative learning is crucial in empowering learners to examine the
complex challenges and interconnections within agrifood systems critically.
Through the integration of critical reflection, dialogue, and experiential
learning, transformative pedagogy enables students to become agents of positive
change and work towards building socially just and ecologically sustainable
agrifood systems. In the subsequent sections, we will explore how
transformative learning can be applied in the context of sustainable agriculture
and environmental education and how educators can facilitate transformative
learning experiences to empower learners to address pressing environmental
challenges and foster a sustainable future.
Pedagogy for transformative
learning
To effectively cultivate transformative learning
experiences in the context of sustainable agriculture and environmental
education, pedagogical principles and approaches play a pivotal role (Horner et
al. 2021). This section delves into key aspects of pedagogy that support
transformative learning, emphasizing learner-centeredness, experiential
learning, critical thinking, and interdisciplinary approaches, as well as
recognizing the significance of emotions and affective aspects in the
transformative learning process (Francis et al. 2020).
Learner-centeredness
Transformative
learning recognizes learners as active agents %20231-241_files/image002.png)
Fig. 1:
Transformative learning in sustainable agriculture and environment
in their educational journey (Cranton 1994).
Learner-centered pedagogy prioritizes learners' individual needs, experiences,
and perspectives, empowering them to take ownership of their learning
process (Filho et al. 2018). In the context of sustainable agriculture
and the environment, learners' backgrounds, cultural contexts, and personal
values are essential aspects to consider in designing transformative learning
experiences (Anand et al. 2020). By tailoring educational approaches to
meet the unique needs of learners, educators can create a supportive and
inclusive learning environment that fosters self-discovery and critical
reflection.
Experiential learning
Experiential learning is a cornerstone of transformative
pedagogy, providing learners with opportunities to engage directly with
real-world issues and challenges (Mezirow 1991). Field experiences, hands-on
projects, and community engagement initiatives immerse learners in the
complexities of sustainable agriculture and environmental problems, allowing
for direct observation and reflection on their impact (Kong 2021). These
experiences deepen learners’ understanding of the subject matter and evoke
emotional connections and a sense of responsibility toward environmental
stewardship.
Critical thinking
Transformative learning necessitates the development of
critical thinking skills, enabling learners to question, analyze, and challenge
prevailing assumptions and paradigms (Cranton 1994; Raikou 2016). By encouraging
learners to examine various perspectives and evidence critically,
transformative pedagogy fosters a deeper understanding of complex agrifood systems
and environmental issues. Critical thinking empowers learners to move beyond
accepting received knowledge and instead engage in independent inquiry and
problem-solving, facilitating transformative insights (Horner et al.
2021).
Interdisciplinary approaches
Sustainable agriculture and environmental challenges are
multifaceted and require holistic solutions that transcend disciplinary
boundaries (Anderson et al. 2019). Integrating interdisciplinary
approaches in transformative pedagogy encourages learners to draw connections
between various fields of knowledge, fostering a more comprehensive
understanding of the interconnectedness of environmental, social, and economic
aspects (Ahmad et al. 2022). By embracing diverse perspectives and
expertise, learners are better equipped to address the systemic complexities of
sustainable agrifood systems.
Emotions and affective aspects
Transformative learning is not solely a cognitive
process but is also deeply influenced by emotions and affective aspects
(Mezirow 1991). Emotions can be powerful catalysts for change, prompting
learners to reevaluate their beliefs and values. In the context of sustainable
agricultural and environmental education, cultivating emotional connections to
the natural world and the communities affected by environmental issues can instigate
transformative shifts in learners' perspectives and motivations for action
(Maiese 2015).
In conclusion,
pedagogy for transformative learning in sustainable agriculture and
environmental education emphasizes learner-centeredness, experiential learning,
critical thinking, interdisciplinary approaches, and the recognition of
emotions and affective aspects. By integrating these principles into
educational practices, educators can create transformative learning experiences
that empower learners to engage with the complexities of agrifood systems
critically, foster a deep sense of environmental stewardship, and contribute to
promoting sustainable and equitable agricultural practices and environmental
conservation. The subsequent sections of this paper will explore the
application of transformative pedagogy in sustainable agriculture and
environment, highlighting examples of transformative learning activities and
discussing the benefits and challenges associated with its implementation.
Sustainable agriculture and environment:
context and challenges
The current state of
sustainable agriculture and the environment presents pressing challenges that
demand urgent attention and transformative solutions (Rehman and Farooq 2023). As global populations continue to grow, the demand
for food and resources places unprecedented strain on the planet's ecosystems
(Calicioglu et al. 2019). This section provides an overview of the key
challenges faced in sustainable agriculture and environmental conservation,
emphasizing the need for transformative approaches to address these critical concerns.
Climate
change
Climate change is
one of the most significant threats to sustainable agriculture and
environmental stability. Rising temperatures, extreme weather events, and shifting
precipitation patterns disrupt agricultural systems, affecting crop yields,
water availability, farmer livelihood, and food security (Muluneh 2021).
Additionally, climate change contributes to biodiversity loss and poses risks
to ecosystem services supporting agriculture, such as pollination and pest
control (Shankar and Shikha 2018). Transformative approaches to sustainable
agriculture and environmental conservation must incorporate climate resilience
strategies, such as climate-smart agricultural practices and ecosystem-based
adaptation.
Biodiversity loss
The loss of
biodiversity is a critical concern that undermines the long-term viability of
agriculture and environmental health (Erisman et al. 2016). Intensive agricultural practices, deforestation, and
habitat destruction led to the loss of plant and animal species essential for
ecological balance and food production (FAO 2021). Preserving biodiversity and
promoting agroecological approaches prioritizing ecosystem diversity are
essential components of transformative strategies to safeguard sustainable
agriculture and the environment.
Soil degradation
Soil degradation
poses a significant threat to sustainable agriculture and food security.
Unsustainable land management practices, such as extensive tillage practices,
overuse of chemical inputs, deforestation, and erosion, deplete soil nutrients
and compromise soil fertility (Gomiero 2016). Transformative approaches to
sustainable agriculture emphasize regenerative practices, such as agroforestry,
conservation agriculture, and soil restoration, to enhance soil health and
ensure the long-term productivity of agricultural lands (Horner et al.
2021). However, climate change is a major factor contributing to land degradation,
which eventually leads to the loss of biodiversity (Webb et al. 2017).
There is therefore a need to find out options for reducing land degradation and
climate-resilient agriculture in the era of climate change.
Unsustainable
farming practices
Conventional farming
practices are heavily reliant on chemical inputs, monoculture, and
mechanization contributing to environmental degradation and social inequities
(FAO 2021). These practices often perpetuate resource depletion, soil erosion,
and water pollution, thereby compromising the resilience of the agricultural
systems (Panhwar et al. 2019). Transformative approaches advocate and
invoke agroecological and regenerative practices that promote biodiversity,
enhance soil health, and minimize environmental impacts, supporting more
sustainable and resilient agrifood systems (Horner et al. 2021).
Food waste and loss
Food waste and loss
present significant challenges in sustainable agriculture and food systems. A
substantial amount of food is lost or wasted throughout the supply chain, from
production to consumption (Chauhan 2021). Transformative solutions may include
addressing the food system inefficiencies, promoting sustainable production
practices, improving post-harvest management, efficient management of the
supply chain, starting innovative food recovery programs (e.g., food banks,
gleaning projects, and surplus food redistribution), increasing public
awareness and education to reduce food waste and ensure more equitable food
distribution, by implementing the policies/regulation that incentivize reducing
food waste and encouraging the partnership between different supply chain
actors of food chain (Wang et al. 2021).
Inequitable
access to resources
The inequitable
distribution of resources, such as land, water, and knowledge, hinders the transition
to sustainable agriculture and environmental conservation (FAO 2021).
Smallholding farmers and marginalized communities often face limited access to
productive resources and are disproportionately affected by environmental
degradation (Nhamo et al. 2022). Transformative approaches advocate for
inclusive and participatory models that empower local communities and promote
equitable access to resources and decision-making (Chiarelli et al. 2022).
In
conclusion, sustainable agriculture and environmental conservation face
critical challenges requiring transformative approaches to address their
complexities effectively. Climate change, biodiversity loss, soil degradation,
unsustainable farming practices, food waste, and inequitable access to
resources are among the pressing concerns that necessitate innovative and inclusive
strategies. Transformative learning and pedagogy are crucial in fostering
understanding and critical thinking. Thus, collaborative efforts are needed to
tackle these challenges and pave the way for a more sustainable and resilient
agrifood system and environment. The subsequent sections of this paper will
explore concrete examples of transformative learning activities and the
potential benefits and challenges associated with implementing transformative
pedagogy in the context of sustainable agriculture and environmental education.
Transformative learning in sustainable
agriculture and environment
In sustainable agriculture and environmental education,
transformative learning is a powerful tool to empower individuals to critically
examine agrifood systems' social, economic, and ecological dimensions and
environmental challenges (Kumar and Kumar 2014; Filho et al. 2018). This
section delves into applying transformative learning in sustainable agriculture
and the environment, showcasing examples of transformative learning activities
that engage learners in experiential and participatory approaches.
Participatory research projects
Transformative pedagogy can be effectively applied
through participatory research projects that involve learners in active collaboration
with communities and stakeholders (Horner et al. 2021). Engaging in
research on sustainable agriculture and environmental issues alongside local
farmers, scientists, and policymakers allows learners to gain firsthand
insights into the complexities of agrifood systems and environmental challenges
(van Oers et al. 2023). This collaborative approach fosters a sense of
shared responsibility and ownership over potential solutions, cultivating
transformative shifts in learners' perspectives and promoting social engagement
for sustainable change (Kuri et al. 2023).
Field experiences
Field experiences are central to transformative learning
in sustainable agriculture and the environment (Bourn and Soysal 2021).
Immersing learners in real-world environments, such as farms, forests, and
natural ecosystems, provide tangible experiences that challenge pre-conceived
notions and elicit emotional connections to the natural world (van Wynsberghe
2022). Through field experiences, learners witness the impact of human
activities on the environment and engage with local communities, facilitating
critical reflection and a deeper understanding of the interconnectedness of
ecological systems.
Community engagement initiatives
Involving learners in community engagement initiatives
allows them to contribute to local, sustainable development efforts actively.
Participating in community-based projects, such as urban gardening,
environmental restoration, and food distribution programs, empowers learners to
apply their knowledge and skills to address pressing environmental and social
issues (Schiavo 2021). Such
transformative learning experiences enhance learners' sense of agency and
foster a profound connection to the communities they serve, reinforcing the
importance of sustainable and equitable agri-food systems (Könings et al. 2021).
Interactive workshops and
dialogue sessions
Transformative learning thrives in dialogical settings
that encourage meaningful exchanges of ideas and perspectives. Interactive
workshops and dialogue sessions allow learners to engage in critical discussions,
challenge assumptions, and explore diverse viewpoints (Horner et al.
2021). Facilitated by educators and experts, these transformative learning
activities promote a deeper understanding of complex agrifood systems and
environmental issues, encouraging learners to think critically and creatively
about sustainable solutions (Filho et al. 2018).
Digital tools and technology
integration
Leveraging technology and digital tools can enhance transformative
learning experiences in sustainable agriculture and environmental education
(Sarker et al. 2019). Online platforms, simulations, and virtual reality
experiences can offer learners immersive opportunities to explore different
scenarios and engage with complex environmental challenges (Kong 2021). For
example, many agriculture scientists in Pakistan interact with students and
farmers through digital platforms such as WhatsApp, YouTube, etc. which have
proven very effective. Additionally, technology enables global collaboration
and knowledge sharing, connecting learners with diverse perspectives and
expertise worldwide, further enriching their transformative learning journey.
Transformative
learning activities in sustainable agriculture and environmental education
leverage participatory research projects, field experiences, community engagement
initiatives, interactive workshops and digital tools to empower learners to
engage with real-world challenges and opportunities critically. By immersing
learners in experiential and dialogical learning experiences, transformative
pedagogy ignites a deep sense of environmental stewardship and social
responsibility. The subsequent sections will explore the benefits and
challenges associated with implementing transformative pedagogy in sustainable
agriculture and environmental education, shedding light on the transformative
potential of these approaches.
Benefits and challenges of implementing
transformative pedagogy
Implementing
transformative pedagogy in sustainable agriculture and environmental education
offers numerous benefits for learners, educators, and communities (Fig. 2;
Horner et al. 2021). However, it also presents inherent challenges that
require careful consideration and proactive strategies. This section explores
the advantages and obstacles of transformative learning approaches in these
fields.
Benefits
Increased
awareness and understanding: Transformative
pedagogy fosters a deep understanding of the complexities of sustainable
agriculture and environmental challenges (Filho et al. 2018). By
encouraging critical reflection and experiential learning, learners gain a
holistic view of agrifood systems and environmental issues, recognizing the
inter-connectedness of social, economic, and ecological dimensions (Horner et
al. 2021). This heightened awareness enables learners to make informed
decisions and advocate for sustainable practices.
Empowerment
and agency: Transformative
learning empowers learners to become proactive agents of change (Howell 2021).
By engaging with real-world problems and participating in community
initiatives, learners develop a sense of agency and efficacy, feeling capable
of positively impacting environmental issues. This empowerment fuels motivation
and commitment to creating sustainable and equitable agrifood systems.
Development
of critical thinking skills: Transformative
pedagogy cultivates critical thinking skills essential for addressing complex
challenges. Learners learn to question assumptions, analyze information
critically, and consider diverse perspectives, enhancing their problem-solving
abilities (Taimur and Onuki 2022). These critical thinking skills are
transferable beyond the classroom, empowering learners to navigate complex
environmental issues personally and professionally.
Building
resilience and adaptability: Experiential
learning and engagement with real-world
challenges build resilience and adaptability in learners (R2021).
Transformative pedagogy equips learners with the skills and mindset to respond effectively to changing circumstances, particularly in the face of
environmental uncertainties and disruptions.
Fostering
collaboration and community engagement: Participatory and community-based learning experiences
foster collaboration and community engagement. Learners develop the ability to
work collectively with diverse stakeholders, promoting inclusive
decision-making and social cohesion within communities (Haron et al.
2017; Mebert et al. 2020). These collaborative skills are essential for
effecting transformative change at multiple levels.
Challenges
Resistance to change: Implementing
transformative pedagogy may encounter resistance from learner’s comfort with
traditional instructional approaches (Dorji et al. 2020). Transformative
learning requires questioning long-held beliefs and values, which some learners
may find challenging or uncomfortable.
Time constraints: Transformative
learning experiences often require more time and resources than conventional
didactic teaching methods (Pugh et al. 2002). Experiential learning,
community engagement, and reflective activities demand careful planning and
coordination, which may be constrained by limited class time or curricular
requirements (Horner et al. 2021).
Need for institutional support: Transformative
pedagogy requires institutional support and commitment. Educational
institutions must provide adequate resources, training, and recognition for
educators who adopt transformative approaches (Dorji et al. 2020).
Without institutional backing, transformative pedagogy may face barriers to
implementation.
Assessing transformational
outcomes: Measuring the transformative impact of
learning experiences can be challenging. Traditional assessment methods may
need to capture the depth of changes occurring within learners' perspectives
and actions. Developing robust evaluation tools to assess transformative
outcomes is essential but can be complex.
Balancing local and global
perspectives: Transformative learning in sustainable agriculture and
environmental education must balance local contexts and global perspectives
(Filho et al. 2018; Anand et al. 2020). While local engagement is
crucial for addressing specific challenges, a global perspective is necessary
to understand the broader interconnectedness of environmental issues.
%20231-241_files/image004.png)
Fig. 2: Benefits and
challenges of implementing transformative pedagogy
In
conclusion, transformative pedagogy in sustainable agriculture and
environmental education offers a range of benefits, including increased awareness,
empowerment, critical thinking skills, and collaboration. However, it also
faces challenges, such as resistance to change, time constraints, the need for
institutional support, and the complexity of assessing transformative outcomes.
Acknowledging and addressing these challenges can enhance the successful
implementation of transformative pedagogy, unlocking its full potential to
empower learners as agents of positive change in sustainable agrifood systems
and environmental conservation. The subsequent sections will highlight the
crucial role of educators and institutions in facilitating transformative
learning experiences and offer recommendations for integrating transformative
pedagogy seamlessly into sustainable agriculture
and environmental education.
Role of educators and institutions
The effective implementation of transformative learning in
sustainable agriculture and environmental education hinges upon the active
involvement of educators and institutions (Filho et al. 2018). This
section emphasizes the crucial role of supportive learning environments,
pedagogical innovation, collaboration, and professional development
opportunities for educators to facilitate transformative learning experiences
(Varela-Losada et al. 2022).
Supportive learning environments
Creating supportive learning environments is fundamental
to transformative pedagogy. Educators must foster a culture of open inquiry,
inclusivity, and trust where learners feel safe challenging their assumptions,
and engaging in critical dialogue. Respectful and non-judgmental discussions
allow learners to express diverse viewpoints, creating a rich and
transformative learning experience.
Pedagogical innovation
Educators play a key role in driving pedagogical
innovation to promote transformative learning. They can integrate various
teaching methods, including experiential learning, participatory approaches,
storytelling, and interactive technology, to cater to diverse learning styles
and engage learners at deeper levels.
Collaboration among educators
and stakeholders
Transformative
learning experiences benefit from collaboration among educators, scholars,
practitioners, and community stakeholders. Interdisciplinary collaborations
foster a more comprehensive understanding of sustainable agriculture and
environmental issues, while engagement with local communities ensures that
learning experiences are contextually relevant and responsive to local needs.
Professional development for
educators
Institutions should prioritize ongoing professional
development opportunities for educators to implement transformative pedagogy
effectively. Workshops, seminars, and training programs can equip educators
with the skills, knowledge and resources necessary to facilitate transformative
learning experiences and address potential challenges.
Cultivating reflective practice
Educators can model reflective practice to inspire
learners' critical reflection. By sharing their own transformative learning
experiences and lessons learned, educators create an authentic and relatable
context for learners to embark on their transformative journeys.
In conclusion,
educators and institutions play a central role in nurturing transformative
learning experiences in sustainable agriculture and environmental education.
Educators can inspire transformative shifts in learners' perspectives and
actions by cultivating supportive learning environments, embracing pedagogical
innovation, promoting collaboration, and offering professional development
opportunities. Institutional commitment to transformative pedagogy provides a
strong foundation for educators to create meaningful and impactful learning
experiences, fostering a generation of environmentally conscious and socially
responsible individuals.
Integrating transformative pedagogy
into sustainable agriculture and environmental education: practical
recommendations for empowering learners
Seamlessly
integrating transformative pedagogy into sustainable agriculture and
environmental education requires deliberate and strategic efforts. This final
section offers practical recommendations to harness the full potential of transformative
learning in empowering learners to become agents of positive change.
Transformative
pedagogy into sustainable agriculture and environmental education
Curriculum
redesign: Incorporate
transformative learning principles into the curriculum by designing outcomes
emphasizing critical reflection, experiential learning, and interdisciplinary
understanding (Chen et al. 2020). Embrace real-world case studies and
complex problem-solving exercises that actively challenge learners to apply
their knowledge to address sustainable agriculture and environmental
challenges.
Interdisciplinary
collaboration: Encourage
interdisciplinary collaboration among faculty members and departments to
develop comprehensive courses that transcend traditional disciplinary boundaries
(Kumar and Kumar 2014). Collaborative projects and cross-disciplinary learning
experiences foster a holistic understanding of agrifood systems and
environmental issues, inspiring transformative insights.
Partnerships with
local communities and organizations: Forge partnerships with local communities, NGOs,
relevant organizations to create authentic and community-engaged transformative
learning experiences. Learners can actively participate in research, projects,
and initiatives contributing to local, sustainable development, fostering a
sense of responsibility and connection to their surroundings.
Technology and
digital tools: Integrate
technology and digital tools strategically to enhance transformative learning
experiences. Online platforms, virtual field trips, and social media can
facilitate global connections and knowledge sharing, while simulations and
interactive tools offer immersive learning opportunities that complement
experiential learning (Kumar and Kumar 2014; Žalėnienė and Pereira
2021).
Evaluation and
assessment: Develop
innovative evaluation and assessment methods to measure transformative learning
outcomes effectively. Consider qualitative approaches, self-assessment, and reflective
writing to capture the depth of learners' transformative experiences (Cooper
2014). Institutional support for alternative assessment methods will
incentivize educators to prioritize transformative pedagogy.
Global
perspectives: Promote
a global perspective in sustainable agriculture and environmental education by incorporating
examples and case studies from diverse regions and cultures
(Žalėnienė and Pereira 2021). This international context enhances
learners' understanding of the relationship among ecological challenges and
fosters a sense of global citizenship.
In
conclusion, integrating transformative pedagogy into sustainable agriculture
and environmental education involves curriculum redesign, interdisciplinary
collaboration, community partnerships, technology integration, and innovative
assessment methods. By embracing these recommendations, educators and
institutions can cultivate transformative learning experiences that empower
learners to confront environmental challenges critically and contribute to
building a sustainable future. Through transformative learning, learners become
active agents of positive change, collectively shaping socially just and
ecologically sound agrifood systems and environmental conservation. This global
prospect holds immense promise for creating a more sustainable and equitable
world for current and future generations.
Transformative
learning in the case of sustainable agriculture and the environment
The pressing issue
of climate change necessitates transformative agricultural practices to ensure
better livelihoods and preserve assets (Swartling and Vulturius 2013).
Transformative learning offers a powerful tool for building a more sustainable
environment, extending beyond traditional education to include direct
experiences and developing sustainability skills (Driskell and Chawla 2009).
The rise of sustainable agriculture and food systems courses worldwide reflects
the alignment of transformative learning with experiential approaches to
education (Jordan et al. 2014; David and Bell 2018). Leveraging higher
education to transform agricultural food systems involves framing learning
opportunities that encourage critical reflection on students' positionality
within food systems and facilitating engagement with selected components of
their food systems (Cranton 1994).
Agricultural
and environmental sustainability
The pursuit of
agricultural sustainability is vital for feeding the world and maintaining a
sustainable society, necessitating the removal of hazardous food production
practices to maintain biophysical balance. Four main domains—technocentric,
ecocentric, holocentric, and egocentric—present worldwide views on
sustainability, serving as a basis to explore key issues in the debate (Wals
and Bawden 2000). Teaching sustainability requires educators to shift mental
models and adopt positive ways of discussing humanity's destiny and other
spiritual and normative convictions.
Sustainable
agriculture and environment in experimental learning
Sustainability
demands critical thinking and problem-solving skills, empowerment, responsibility,
and self-commitment. Transformative pedagogy, with experimental learning as a
key component, facilitates education on sustainable agriculture and the
environment, enabling learners to engage in various agricultural and
environmental activities and connect with nature through enhanced thinking
skills and capabilities (Farren 2016). Critical aspects of agricultural
evolution in climate change adaptation include developing accessible and
adaptable platforms for cooperation, increasing involvement, and communicating
clear leadership commitments (Togbé et al. 2015). Transformative social
learning facilitates multi-stakeholder interactions, cooperative learning,
innovation, and entrepreneurial abilities, which are essential for adaptability
and decision-making in environmental contexts (Orderud and Winsvold 2012).
Conclusion
This article
underscores the significance of transformative pedagogy in the context of
sustainable agriculture and environmental education. By encouraging learners to
reflect critically on their assumptions and beliefs, transformative learning
empowers individuals to become proactive agents of change in addressing complex
environmental challenges and promoting sustainable agriculture practices. The
key principles of learner-centeredness, experiential learning, critical
thinking, interdisciplinary collaboration, and technology integration provide a
robust framework for integrating transformative pedagogy into educational
practices. The paper highlights the transformative potential of experiential
learning, participatory research projects, and community engagement initiatives,
which foster a deeper understanding of local challenges and encourage learners
to contribute to sustainable solutions actively. However, it also acknowledges
the challenges of resistance to change and the need for institutional support
to implement transformative pedagogy effectively. Further research and
collaboration among educators, institutions, and stakeholders are essential to
advance transformative learning in sustainable agriculture and environmental
education. Emphasizing the importance of continuous professional development
for educators and incorporating robust evaluation and assessment methods can
strengthen the impact of transformative pedagogy. This paper seeks to inspire a
collective commitment to fostering a more sustainable and resilient future for
our planet by reaffirming the importance of transformative learning and
advocating for its integration into sustainable agriculture and environmental
education.
Acknowledgements
The assistance provided by Ahmad
Nawaz, Abdul Rehman, Faisal Nadeem and Fasihullah Haider in writing this
article is acknowledged.
Author
Contributions
Muhammad Farooq conceived the idea
and finalized the manuscript.
Conflicts
of Interest
Author declares no conflict of
interest.
Data
Availability
Not
applicable.
Ethics
Approval
Not applicable.
Funding Source
No funding was received for this
study.
References
Anand TS, SV Anand, M Welch, VJ Marsick, A Langer
(2020). Overview of transformative learning I: theory and its evolution. Reflective
Prac 21:732–743
Anderson CR, MD Anderson (2020). Resources to inspire a
transformative agroecology: a curated guide. In: Transformation of Our Food
Systems: The Making of a Paradigm Shift, pp:169–180. Zukunftsstiftung
Landwirtschaft, Foundation on Future Farming, Germany
Anderson CR, C Maughan, MP Pimbert (2019).
Transformative agroecology learning in Europe: building consciousness, skills
and collective capacity for food sovereignty. Agric Hum Values
36:531–547
Bourn D, N Soysal (2021). Transformative learning and
pedagogical approaches in education for sustainable development: Are initial
teacher education programmes in England and Turkey ready for creating agents of
change for sustainability? Sustainability 13:8973
Calicioglu O, A Flammini, S Bracco, L Bellů, R Sims
(2019). The future challenges of food and agriculture: an integrated analysis
of trends and solutions. Sustainability 11:222
Chauhan C, A Dhir, MU Akram, J Salo (2021). Food loss and
waste in food supply chains. A systematic literature review and framework
development approach. J Clean Prod 295:126438
Chen Y, TA Daamen, EWTM Heurkens, WJ Verheul (2020). Interdisciplinary
and experiential learning in urban development management education. Intl J
Technol Des Educ 30:919–936
Chiarelli DD, P D’Odorico, MF Müller, ND Mueller, KF
Davis, J Dell’Angelo, G Penny, MC Rulli (2022). Competition for water induced
by transnational land acquisitions for agriculture. Nat Commun 13:505
Cooper S (2014). Transformative evaluation:
Organizational learning through participative practice. Learn Org
2:146–157
Cranton P (1994). Understanding and Promoting
Transformative Learning: A Guide for Educators of Adults. Jossey-Bass, San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series
David C, MM Bell (2018) New challenges for education in
agroecology. Agroecol Sustain Food Syst 42:612–619
Dorji K, P Tshering, T Wangchuk, S Jatsho (2020). The
implication of transformative pedagogy in classroom teaching: A case of Bhutan.
J Pedag Soc Psychol 2:59–68
Driskell D, L Chawla (2009). Learning by Doing:
Education for Sustainable Development Through Place-based Action Research.
Young People, Education, and Sustainable Development, pp:91–98. Wageningen
Academic Publishers, Netherlands
Erisman JW, N van Eekeren, J de Wit, C Koopmans, W
Cuijpers, N Oerlemans, BJ Koks (2016). Agriculture and biodiversity: a better
balance benefits both. AIMS Agric Food 1:157–174
FAO (2021). The Role of Genetic Resources for Food
and Agriculture in Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation.
CGRFA/WG-FGR-6/21/Inf.6
Farren P (2016). Transformative pedagogy in the context
of language teaching: Being and becoming. World J Educ Technol 8:190–204
Filho WL, S
Raath, B Lazzarini, VR Vargas, L de Souza, R Anholon, OLG Quelhas, R Haddad, M
Klavins, VL Orlovic (2018). The role of transformation in learning and
education for sustainability. J Cleaner Prod 199:286–295
Fleming T (2018) Critical theory and transformative
learning: Rethinking the radical intent of Mezirow’s theory. Intl J Adult
Voc Educ Technol 9:1–13
Francis C, AM Nicolaysen, G Lieblein, TA Breland (2020).
Transformative education in agroecology: student, teacher, and client
involvement in colearning. Intl J Agric Nat Resour 47:280–294
Gomiero T (2016). Soil degradation, land scarcity and
food security: Reviewing a complex challenge. Sustainability 8:281
Molina MGD (2013) Agroecology and politics. How to get
sustainability? About the necessity for a political agroecology. Agroecol
Sustain Food Syst 37:45–59
Haron H, NHN Aziz, A Harun (2017). A conceptual model
participatory engagement within e-learning community. Proc Comp Sci
116:242–250
Horner CE, C Morse, N Carpenter, KL Nordstrom, JW
Faulkner, T Mares, E Kinnebrew, M Caswell, V Izzo, VE Méndez, SA Lewins, N
McCune (2021). Cultivating pedagogy for transformative learning: A decade of
undergraduate agroecology education. Front Sustain Food Syst 5:751115
Howell RA (2021) Engaging students in education for
sustainable development: The benefits of active learning, reflective practices
and flipped classroom pedagogies. J Cleaner Prod 325:129318
Jordan N, J Grossman, JP Lawrence, A Harmon, W Dyer, B
Maxwell KV Cadieux, R Galt, A Rojas, C Byker, S Ahmed, T Bass, E Kebreab, V
Singh, T Michaels, C Tzenis (2014). New curricula for undergraduate
food-systems education: A sustainable agriculture education perspective. Nacta
J 58:302
Kong Y (2021). The role of experiential learning on
students’ motivation and classroom engagement. Front Psychol 12:771272
Könings KD, S Mordang, F Smeenk, L Stassen, S Ramani
(2021). Learner involvement in the co-creation of teaching and learning: AMEE
Guide No. 138. Medical Teacher 43:924–936
Kumar A, VA Kumar (2014). Pedagogy in higher education
of agriculture. Proc - Soc Behav Sci 152:89–93
Kuri SK, KA Vines, LV Crowder, OA Abaye (2023).
Exploring the level of teaching practices of the agricultural education at
Bangladesh Agricultural University (BAU). Soc Sci Humanit Open 8:100563
Maiese M (2015). Transformative learning, enactivism,
and affectivity. Stud Phil Educ 36:197–216
Mebert L, R Barnes, J Dalley, L Gawarecki, F
Ghazi-Nezami, G Shafer, J Slater, E Yezbick (2020). Fostering student
engagement through a real-world, collaborative project across disciplines and institutions.
Higher Educ Pedagogies 5:30–51
Méndez VE, M Caswell, SR Gliessman, R Cohen (2017).
Integrating agroecology and participatory action research (PAR): Lessons from
Central America. Sustainability 9:705
Mezirow J (1978). Perspective transformation. Adult
Educ 28:100–110
Mezirow J (1991). Transformative Dimensions of Adult
Learning. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, California, USA
Migliorini P, G Lieblein (2016). Facilitating
transformation and competence development in sustainable agriculture university
education: an experiential and action-oriented approach. Sustainability
8:1243
Muluneh MG (2021). Impact of climate change on
biodiversity and food security: a global perspective—a review article. Agric
Food Secur 10:36
Nhamo L, S Mpandeli, S Liphadzi, T Mabhaudhi (2022).
Securing land and water for food production through sustainable land reform: A
nexus planning perspective. Land 11:974
Orderud GI, M Winsvold (2012). The role of learning and
knowledge in adapting to climate change: a case study of Norwegian municipalities.
Inter J Environ Stud 69:946–961
Panhwar QA, A Ali, UA Naher, MY Memon, D Li (2019).
Fertilizer management strategies for enhancing nutrient use efficiency and
sustainable wheat production. In: Organic Farming, pp:17–39. Chandran S,
MR Unni, S Thomas (Eds.). Woodhead Publishing, Sawston, UK
Probst L, L
Bardach, D Kamusingize, N Templer, H Ogwali, A Owamani, L Mulumba, R Onwonga,
BT Adugna (2019). A transformative university learning experience
contributes to sustainability attitudes, skills and agency. J Cleaner Prod
232:648–656
Pugh KJ (2002). Teaching for transformative experiences
in science: An investigation of the effectiveness of two instructional elements.
Teachers Coll Rec 104:1101–1137
Radović S, HGK Hummel, M Vermeulen (2021). The challenge
of designing ‘more’ experiential learning in higher education programs in the
field of teacher education: A systematic review study. Intl J Lifelong Educ
40:545–560
Raikou N (2016). Development of critical thinking
through aesthetic experience: The case of students of an educational
department. J Transfor Educ 14:53–70
Rehman A, M Farooq (2023) Challenges, constraints, and
opportunities in sustainable agriculture and environment. In: Sustainable
Agriculture and the Environment, pp:487–501. Farooq M, N Gogoi, M Pisante
(Eds.). Academic Press, London
Sarker MN, M Wu, Q Cao, GM Alam, D Li (2019). Leveraging
digital technology for better learning and education: A systematic literature
review. Intl J Infor Educ Technol 9:453–461
Schiavo R (2021). What is true community engagement and
why it matters (now more than ever). J Commun Health 14:91-92
Shankar S, Shikha (2018). Impacts of climate change on
agriculture and food security. In: Biotechnology for Sustainable Agriculture,
pp:207–234. Singh RL, S Mondal (Eds.). Woodhead Publishing, Sawston, UK
Swartling ĹG, G Vulturius (2013). Transformative Learning
and Engagement with Climate Change Adaptation: Experiences with Sweden’s
Forestry Sector. Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
Taimur S, M Onuki (2022). Design thinking as digital
transformative pedagogy in higher sustainability education: Cases from Japan
and Germany. Intl J Educ Res 114:101994
Taylor E, P Cranton (2013) A theory in progress? Issues
in transformative learning theory. Eur J Res Educ Lear Adults 4:33–47
Togbé CE, R Haagsma, AK Aoudji, SD Vodouhę (2015).
Effect of participatory research on farmers' knowledge and practice of IPM: The
case of cotton in Benin. J Agric Educ
Ext 21:421–440
van Oers L, G Feola, H Runhaar, E Moors (2023).
Unlearning in sustainability transitions: Insight from two Dutch
community-supported agriculture farms. Environ Innov Soc Trans 46:100693
van Wynsberghe A (2022). Social robots and the risks to
reciprocity. AI Soc 37:479–485
Varela-Losada M, U Pérez-Rodríguez, MA Lorenzo-Rial, P
Vega-Marcote (2022). In search of transformative learning for sustainable
development: Bibliometric analysis of recent scientific production. Front Educ
7:786560
Wals
AE, R Bawden (2000) Integrating sustainability into agricultural education:
Dealing with complexity, uncertainty and diverging worldviews.
Interuniversity Conference for Agricultural and Related Sciences in Europe
(ICA), Universiteit Gent, Gent, Belgium
Wang Y, Z Yuan, Y Tang (2021). Enhancing food security
and environmental sustainability: A critical review of food loss and waste
management. Resour Environ Sustain 4:100023
Webb NP, NA Marshall, LC Stringer, MS Reed, A Chappell, JE
Herrick (2017). Land degradation and climate change: Building climate
resilience in agriculture. Front Ecol Environ 15:450–459
Wezel A, S Bellon, T Dor, C Francis, D Vallod, C David
(2009). Agroecology as a science, a movement and a practice. a review. Agron
Sustain Dev 29:503–515
Žalėnienė I, P Pereira (2021). Higher
education for sustainability: A global perspective. Geogr Sustain
2:99–106